I'm getting more and more tired of the whole obsessive focus with Vietnam. Here's a poll that I'd love to see asked.
The two major party candidates for the Presidency were adults in this decade, the '90s, the '80s, the '70s and the '60s. Considering their actions, their personal and public record how would you order each record in terms of their importance?
Is there any doubt that people would large view the most recent record as most important and the actions of either man's youth as least important? But is that the way things are being covered?
Posted by TMLutas at February 17, 2004 03:40 PM