October 01, 2011
Negative knowledge value
Matt Yglesias actually understates the knowledge problems of nation-building efforts in his post today:
But the point is that a country like Afghanistan is chock full of Afghan people who know lots and lots and lots about Afghanistan. Then you have U.S. government personnel who, from the top decision-makers in DC down to the enlisted troops on the front lines, don’t so much as speak the relevant languages. America has the preponderance of money, firepower, etc. but none of that changes the fact that local actors have all the knowledge. So rather than us (or before us the Russians) successfully using our assets to manipulate the situation, local actors wind up manipulating the assets we have to serve their own ends.
I WISH that was the whole problem, but it's not. If the Western intervenor's knowledge had been zero, or if he'd been only unable to discern where the value in what he'd heard was, well, the worst case there is that those Afghans with connections and influence with the West would have done better relatively than those who didn't. And that happens, true.
But that's not the worst part. We didn't just arrive in Afghanistan and try to operate with no information: by definition, nation-building implies believing that the information your friends in the occupied nation have is counter-productive to your and their best interest. "This is the way we've always done things," in any other context a statement worthy of its due, is derided by the nation-builder with a, "well, that must have been the cause of your problems."
It's when combined with any kind of arrogance like this, however well-meaning, that the information problem becomes truly pernicious for the Western intervenors, as they start ripping up traditions and norms they barely understand and for which their proposed substitutes are entirely unsuited.
There's a time and place to offer a struggling government or people help. The trick seems to be in getting them to define it, so that the Westerner doesn't have to both define the problem AND offer a solution from a low-information environment. Otherwise, that removal of agency on the part of the host is fatal to any sort of lasting success in this realm, it seems
"endearingly macho" -- Mark Steyn
"wonderfully detailed analysis" -- John Allemang, Globe and Mail
"unusually candid" -- Tom Ricks, Foreignpolicy.com
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
News:
The Globe and Mail
The Star
The Wash. Post
Opinion:
TNR
Slate
Washington Monthly
Rants:
Canadians
Penny
Janes
Cosh
The Hound
Coyne
Wells
Farrell, etc.
Steyn
Levant
Afghanistan
The Torch
Abu M.
Bill & Bob
Ghosts of Alex
Registan
Jari
Ink Spots
Ackerman
Kings
FRI
Embedded
Milnews.ca
Can-AFG
The Capt.
Etc.
TMLutas
Sullivan
Marshall
Kaus
Lileks
Reynolds
Welch
Farber
The Shark
Breen
Henley
Electrolite
Samizdata
Slotman
Simberg
Northrup
Bryant
Yglesias
Cole
Drum
Clients/Employers
(Past and Present):
U of T
Cdn. Forces
CG Magazine
LRC
Adrenaline Vault