July 23, 2010
Today's essential Afghan reading: Tim Lynch again
Baba Tim encapsulates the key problem with any kind of "arm the tribes/auxiliary police" approach.
Reconstruction is not hard, establishing credibility is and that takes time in countries like Afghanistan. It also takes people who can operate on their own on the economy and not just survive but continue to function if attacked. That kind of thinking is not found inside the closed loop of the classified crowd. They do not know what they do not know. They can’t leave the FOB’s so they don’t have an accurate read on anything except what comes through the classified loop. Anyone who has dealt with that sort of information understands how limited it is.
Which bring us back to the Local Security Forces. This “inspired” idea of using locals to provide security will fail because nobody responsible for it will get off the FOB to provide daily detailed supervision. I can’t stress enough the importance of daily, full time, supervision. The Skipper’s EOD program works because he provides daily, detailed supervision, while EOD programs elsewhere in the country languish.
This is the real problem with these sorts of approach. If you don't have at least as much Western mentoring and liaison (I don't think we'll ever achieve "supervision" of security forces) as you do with the police now (and mentoring of police even a year ago in Afghanistan was in many parts of the country essentially drive-by already) then any effort and money will be wasted. But if you do have that kind of partnering of Western and Afghan forces, then why not give them the added imprimatur that comes with a formal place in, and paying them as if they were, in the "national" security forces?
Supporters see the auxiliary police or "arm the tribes" approaches as a new form of force augmentation where Western support and awareness can be limited, Afghan government and ISAF deniability can be preserved, and the newly armed locals can assert they don't have to take other people's orders. But any force you establish that carries those limitations is highly unlikely to contribute to anyone's security, ever.
(The Karzai family and other Afghans support new "arm the tribes" plans because they figure, rightly, that their militias and their supporters can skim off a lot of the proceeds. But it's hard to see what ISAF gets out of it strategically, other than possibly to drive up the price that the insurgents would have to pay to neutralize or coopt local would-be warlords.)
Howz-e hasn't changed much, I see
Just another day on Ring Road South, courtesy of CBS News.
Howz-e Madad was always a hardship post. What you had during our tour was significant unappreciated population movement, as people vacated the green belt south of the highway, between the road and the river, to avoid the fighting, establishing themselves in temporary dwellings in the desert north of the road. It had the tendency of making our aerial photographs and maps of this area a little outdated. Attacks on Western and ANA facilities in this area were regular, and the displaced population and those still living in the green belt both entirely unconvinced of the merits of a Western/ANA presence. In the video, you can see the Afghans are firing south from the strong point across the road, towards the green belt, which is likely where the attack came from, and where it withdrew into. One imagines it was more blowing off steam on the ANA's part than anything else. Getting hit and doing IED sweeps daily without any way to strike back can do that to you.
Indiscriminate firing by Compass Security personnel is also a standard feature of life in Kandahar Province. I suspect those RPG rounds the reporter finds are theirs, as well. The military and police have no monopoly on heavy weapons.
(Impressive (or lucky) attack by the insurgents, btw. Assuming it was an RPG, they either managed to make a difficult shot from distance (you'd normally want to be within 50 m to be sure of hitting an SUV) or they exposed themselves in daylight in broad open, flat, terrain only 400m from a "rapidly expanding U.S. military compound" and then managed to leg it back to cover without incurring casualties, apparently. Almost makes me wonder if a recoilless rifle, man-portable and more accurate at range, was used, instead. But the area around Howz-e, where several canals parallel and south of the road allow close approaches to the road with easy exfiltration back into the green belt, has been a historic location for direct-fire ambushes on highway traffic since the Soviet days.)
"endearingly macho" -- Mark Steyn
"wonderfully detailed analysis" -- John Allemang, Globe and Mail
"unusually candid" -- Tom Ricks, Foreignpolicy.com
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
News:
The Globe and Mail
The Star
The Wash. Post
Opinion:
TNR
Slate
Washington Monthly
Rants:
Canadians
Penny
Janes
Cosh
The Hound
Coyne
Wells
Farrell, etc.
Steyn
Levant
Afghanistan
The Torch
Abu M.
Bill & Bob
Ghosts of Alex
Registan
Jari
Ink Spots
Ackerman
Kings
FRI
Embedded
Milnews.ca
Can-AFG
The Capt.
Etc.
TMLutas
Sullivan
Marshall
Kaus
Lileks
Reynolds
Welch
Farber
The Shark
Breen
Henley
Electrolite
Samizdata
Slotman
Simberg
Northrup
Bryant
Yglesias
Cole
Drum
Clients/Employers
(Past and Present):
U of T
Cdn. Forces
CG Magazine
LRC
Adrenaline Vault