May 23, 2002
'A NATIONAL DISGRACE' The National
'A NATIONAL DISGRACE'
The National Post, on the Afghan withdrawal. Feh. We have a new national disgrace each week it seems.
And btw, Glenn, I'm not angry. Just tired. Tired of defence taking more of the brunt of government cutbacks than any other federal department. Tired of the fundamental disconnect between our national aspirations to change the world and our willingness to create the tools to do so. And utterly tired of a mainstream media that just can't be bothered to get it.
Case in point, the Toronto Star. In its editorial, it writes:
Canadians spend some $12 billion a year on the military... with 60,000 personnel we should be able to keep infantry in the field, indefinitely
Crap. Do the math. One third of that 60,000 is regular army... 20,000. Of that, one quarter is in workup, one quarter is overseas, one quarter is just recovering from being overseas, and the rest are training the next generation of soldiers... 5,000. Of that one half are logistics troops... 2,500. Of that, one half are other combat arms (artillery, etc.): 1,200. About 1,200 infantry, 2 understrength battalions, available at a time. For the last six months, we've had over 1,500 infantry overseas. That's the math... that's the problem. There is no fat left on this bone.
The Star also calls an end to planning for "tank wars," (Canada lost its ability to conduct offensive ops against an MBT-equipped enemy over a decade ago); more reliance on "reserves" for peacekeeping, even though the Star also favours closing down their Toronto training facilities to help the homeless; and a division between the sustainable "battle group" of rapidly deployable assets (nothing Canada has at the moment is rapidly deployable, so that'd have to be built from scratch) for Afghanistan-type missions, and the "lightly armed" soldiers for NATO and UN duty.
Has the Star even looked at who's in Afghanistan? It's infantry, foot sloggers, armed with man-portable weapons. How do you get lighter than that? A constabulary, perhaps? Maybe... as Lew Mackenzie pointed out this week, the Toronto police force has more men with guns now than the Canadian infantry corps.
"endearingly macho" -- Mark Steyn
"wonderfully detailed analysis" -- John Allemang, Globe and Mail
"unusually candid" -- Tom Ricks, Foreignpolicy.com
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
News:
The Globe and Mail
The Star
The Wash. Post
Opinion:
TNR
Slate
Washington Monthly
Rants:
Canadians
Penny
Janes
Cosh
The Hound
Coyne
Wells
Farrell, etc.
Steyn
Levant
Afghanistan
The Torch
Abu M.
Bill & Bob
Ghosts of Alex
Registan
Jari
Ink Spots
Ackerman
Kings
FRI
Embedded
Milnews.ca
Can-AFG
The Capt.
Etc.
TMLutas
Sullivan
Marshall
Kaus
Lileks
Reynolds
Welch
Farber
The Shark
Breen
Henley
Electrolite
Samizdata
Slotman
Simberg
Northrup
Bryant
Yglesias
Cole
Drum
Clients/Employers
(Past and Present):
U of T
Cdn. Forces
CG Magazine
LRC
Adrenaline Vault